Securitain Docs
On this page

Finding Status Reference

The canonical lifecycle states used by Securitain findings — what each status means, how findings move between them and which statuses remain part of gross technical risk.

Finding status describes what is happening to the finding operationally. It does not change finding severity, the underlying AWS configuration or evidence unless a new scan or governance action changes that underlying context.

Status groups

Every current finding status belongs to one of three mutually exclusive lifecycle groups.

Active

Open
In Progress
Pending Approval
Pending Verification

Part of gross technical risk. In the active lifecycle.

Accepted

Suppressed
Exception Approved

Part of gross technical risk. Condition still exists but deferred/accepted.

Closed

Remediated
False Positive

Not part of gross technical risk. Condition verified absent or detection determined incorrect.

Active group

The finding is still in the active lifecycle. The technical condition remains part of gross technical risk.

Accepted group

The finding is no longer in the immediate active work queue. The technical condition still exists and remains part of gross technical risk.

Closed group

The finding no longer contributes to gross technical risk. The two closed statuses have very different meanings:

  • Remediated: a capable scan verified the technical condition is absent.
  • False Positive: a human determined the detection itself is incorrect.

Gross-risk set

Gross Technical Risk
=
Active (Open / In Progress / Pending Approval / Pending Verification)
+
Accepted (Suppressed / Exception Approved)

NOT included:
Remediated — condition verified absent
False Positive — detection determined incorrect
Closed findings leave the gross risk set. Accepted findings do not.

Actionable vs Active

The backend also distinguishes findings that still need a direct human action. Current actionable statuses are Open, In Progress and Pending Approval. Pending Verification is still Active and contributes to gross risk, but it is waiting for scan verification rather than an additional human decision. This distinction is useful for work queues.

Open

GroupActive
Gross technical riskYes
Active work queueYes

The finding is active and currently available for investigation and work. Common current actions depending on workflow: Start Work, Request Verification, Suppress Temporarily, Mark False Positive, Request Exception.

In Progress

GroupActive
Gross technical riskYes
Active work queueYes

The team has started working the finding. The technical condition is still present until verified otherwise. Common actions: return to Open, Request Verification, Suppress Temporarily, Mark False Positive, Request Exception.

Pending Approval

GroupActive
Gross technical riskYes
Active work queueYes

The finding is waiting for an approval-related workflow decision. It remains active. Pending Approval is a workflow-driven state — there is not necessarily a dedicated status-change button for this state in every UI context.

Pending Verification

GroupActive
Gross technical riskYes
Direct human actionTypically no — waiting for scan

The customer believes a remediation change has been applied and is waiting for a successful capable scan to verify the original condition is gone.

Pending Verification
     ↓
Successful capable scan
     ├── condition absent  →  Remediated
     └── condition present →  Open
The scan result determines the next status from Pending Verification.

Suppressed

GroupAccepted
Gross technical riskYes — condition still exists
Active work queueNo

Important

Suppressed does not mean fixed, false positive or safe. The finding is intentionally deferred temporarily.

Suppression requires a meaningful reason and a future expiry. The backend enforces a minimum reason length and a maximum suppression duration of 365 days.

Suppression expiry

Suppressed
    ↓
Expiry
    ↓
Open
An expired suppression returns the finding to the active work queue.

The finding returns to the active work queue when suppression expires. The technical condition never stopped being part of gross technical risk during suppression.

Exception Approved

GroupAccepted
Gross technical riskYes — condition still exists
Active work queueNo
Managed throughGovernance → Exceptions

The finding is a real technical condition that has been formally accepted through Securitain's exception workflow. This state is managed through Governance → Exceptions rather than the generic finding status action. To end the accepted-risk decision, use the exception workflow: revoke, expiry or later remediation.

Remediated

GroupClosed
Gross technical riskNo

Important

Users cannot directly self-certify a finding as Remediated through the generic status action. The correct workflow is: Apply change → Request Verification → Pending Verification → Successful capable scan → Remediated.
Apply change
    ↓
Request Verification
    ↓
Pending Verification
    ↓
Successful capable scan
    ↓
Remediated
Remediated requires scan verification — not self-certification.

Remediated recurrence

Cloud configurations can drift. If a later scan detects the same condition again:

Remediated
   ↓
Condition reappears in later scan
   ↓
Open
A recurrence returns the finding to the active queue with its history intact.

False Positive

GroupClosed
Gross technical riskNo
RequiresA reason

The organization determined that the detection itself does not correctly represent the security condition. A normal later scan does not silently reopen a False Positive simply because the detector emits the same key again — the human classification persists. A user can intentionally reopen the finding if needed.

False Positive vs Exception Approved

False Positive

Securitain's detection is wrong for this case

The finding is incorrect. The technical condition does not exist or was misclassified. Contributes no gross technical risk.

Exception Approved

Detection is real — the business accepts the risk

The technical condition exists. The organization has chosen to formally accept it. Still part of gross technical risk.

Important

Never use False Positive to clean up a dashboard when the detection is correct.

Reopen

Current lifecycle allows closed or accepted findings to return to Open in supported cases. Examples:

  • Remediated finding intentionally reopened
  • False Positive reconsidered by the team
  • Suppression ended manually before expiry

Exception Approved is managed through the exception workflow rather than generic Reopen.

Status history

Every lifecycle change should preserve history. Current history semantics include:

  • from status and to status
  • reason
  • actor
  • source (user action or system/scan)
  • timestamp

This supports auditability, governance, recurrence analysis and remediation evidence.

User transition vs system transition

User/workflow transitions

  • Open → In Progress
  • Open → Suppressed
  • Open → False Positive
  • Request Exception workflow

System/scan transitions

  • Pending Verification → Remediated
  • Pending Verification → Open
  • Remediated → Open on recurrence
  • Suppressed → Open on expiry

Status transition reference

Note

The backend remains the final source of truth. This simplified matrix is for orientation only.
Current statusTypical next states
OpenIn Progress, Pending Verification, Suppressed, False Positive, Exception Request
In ProgressOpen, Pending Verification, Suppressed, False Positive, Exception Request
Pending ApprovalOpen, In Progress, Pending Verification, Suppressed
Pending VerificationRemediated (scan), Open (if re-detected)
SuppressedOpen (expiry/reopen), In Progress, False Positive
Exception ApprovedManaged by exception revoke/expiry/remediation workflow
RemediatedOpen (if recurrent/reopened)
False PositiveOpen (if intentionally reconsidered)

Why status does not change severity

A Critical finding suppressed is still a Critical technical condition. Status tells the business decision and workflow. Severity tells the technical significance. They are independent dimensions.

Why status does not change evidence

Suppressing or approving an exception should not delete the evidence that created the finding. The evidence remains useful for governance, audit and future remediation.